Github desktop vs sourcetree how to#
Github desktop vs sourcetree software#

This helps lower the volume of notifications for this repository. Thank you for reading! If you are interested in voting up this or any other feature request, please consider adding 👍 reactions to any of the comments in this thread instead of posting '+1' comments. (The latter would technically be possible but not straightforward on Windows.)įinally, even with tehnical aspects of all this brushed aside, the functionality described by gitflow doesn't match our priorities for the set of features we are aiming to implement in Desktop at this moment.Īnyway, I hope this explains our rationale a little bit.

Github desktop vs sourcetree how to#

Even with the graphical UI out of the way, there would still be an engineering overhead in either re-implementing all of gitflow branching operations in Node.js, or around figuring out how to bundle an existing implementation and make sure that the bash scripts run reliably across platforms. It is suitable for SMEs in any industry sector to visualize and manage Git repositories.

Github desktop vs sourcetree software#

When people ask for 'git flow support' in Desktop, I assume that the request is that Desktop implements graphical UI features that facilitate starting & stopping of 'features', 'releases', and 'hotfixes' (as per gitflow nomenclature), and that those operations result in underlying git branches of a specific naming convention being created or merged.Ĭonsidering that this feature entails that there would also be a UI that helps users set up the repo with git flow and configure the naming conventions for different kind of branches, the scope of implementing and maintaining all this additional functionality within Desktop is not something that the core team is able to take on right now. Sourcetree software is for software engineers, web developers, IT consultants, and system network architects. GitHub Desktop already supports branching and merging, which makes following the gitflow set of conventions possible, although potentially more cumbersome. Bitbucket vs Github: Two of the largest source code.

GitHub has a huge open-source community and Bitbucket tends to have mostly enterprise and business users. 'Gitflow' is two things: it is a specific branching workflow that facilitates a software development & release process, and it is a reference implementation of that workflow in bash. If you boil it down to the most basic difference between GitHub and Bitbucket, it is that GitHub is focused around public code and Bitbucket is for private. To provide a bit more context around why, I thought that it might be helpful to first try define the parameters of this feature. This issue has been closed and remains closed because we are no more able to fit this on our roadmap than we were 2 years ago. It sounds like adding this functionality would certainly help the adoption of GitHub Desktop by certain teams.

Thank you all for expressing your needs for this feature.